The following is an analysis of the project's consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines.
Stonework: Residential Design Guideline 9.9 encourages simple stonework that looks traditional in character. Residential Design Guideline 9.10 encourages stonework to appear structural and authentic. Residential Design Guideline 9.10 discourages the use of gratuitous or purely decorative appearing stonework.
Staff Response: New Carmel stone around the front entry and the chimney is proposed. The Carmel Stone was previously approved as part of a previous permit in 2013. The proposed stonework is uncoursed and roughly squared in keeping with the Residential Design Guidelines Appendix A. Condition of Approval #19 requires the applicant to clearly identify in the construction drawings the masonry pattern for all stonework. Stone facades shall be installed in a broken course/random or similar masonry pattern. Setting the stones vertically on their face in a cobweb pattern shall not be permitted. All stonework shall be wrapped around building corners and terminated at an inside corner or a logical stopping point that provides a finished appearance. Termination of stonework shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Planning & Building Director or their designee.
Windows and Doors: Residential Design Guideline 9.11 states that materials other that authentic, unclad wood are appropriate only when it can be demonstrated that the proposed material is more appropriate to the architecture.
Staff Response: New aluminum doors and windows are proposed to replace existing wood and steel windows and doors. The new windows and doors are proposed to be Quartz Edgeline Aluminum Windows in the “champagne light range” color. The Historic Context Statement includes aluminum windows as appropriate for Ranch architecture, but aluminum windows are not preferred in the Design Guidelines unless they are determined to be more appropriate to the architecture than wood or wood-clad. Special Condition of Approval #41 requires the applicant to submit revised plans with wood or wood-clad windows. The Planning Commission has approved aluminum windows previously and can strike Condition of Approval #41 from the resolution if they deem aluminum more appropriate than wood or wood-clad windows.
Roofing: Residential Design Guideline 9.8 states that Metal, plastic, and glass roofs are inappropriate in all neighborhoods.
Staff Response: The applicant is proposing to replace the existing wood shake roof with a vertical standing seam metal roof. The new roof is proposed to be a Sheffield metals Champagne Metallic cool IR roof. Most of the surrounding homes in the neighborhood have wood shake or composite shingle roofs. There are several roofs in the neighborhood with gravel ballast or metal roofs. The proposed vertical standing seam metal roof could add more diversity in roofing material to the neighborhood. The Planning Commission has approved metal roofs with a matte finish and a low SRI in the past. Special Condition of Approval #38 requires the applicant to submit an alternative material for the roofing. The applicant can propose a vertical standing seam metal roof that has an SRI below 25 or a different approvable roof material.
Fencing/Gate: Residential Design Guideline 11.1 encourages blending the landscaping from the right-of-way with landscaping on private property and using landscaping if privacy is desired. Guideline 11.3 encourages fences and walls be kept low and have open, transparent qualities.
Staff response: A new 6-foot high double-sided horizontal wood fence with a one-foot horizontal wood “trellis-like” addition to the top is proposed within the front yard setback on the south property line along 2nd Avenue, replacing existing 6-foot tall vertical wood board and batten fencing. Staff informed the applicant that the existing, nonconforming fence can be repaired or replaced in kind per CMC 17.10.030.E.2. A 6-foot tall and 10-foot 5-inch wide gate is proposed for the middle of the new fencing. Carmel Municipal Code (CMC) Table 17.10-G: Maximum Track One Fence and Wall Heights states that fences shall not be taller than 4-feet in the front yard setback. A foot note from Table 17.10-G states that, “These limits shall not be altered through Design Review by the Planning Commission.” The proposed fencing does not comply with the Carmel Municipal Code or Residential Design Guidelines. Special Condition of Approval #39 requires the applicant to submit revised plans with new fencing for the property that allows for an open feel, filtered light views into the yard, and complies with CMC 17.10.030.E.1 (fences in the front setback shall be below 4 feet, not alterable by the Planning Commission).
A new 6-foot high double-sided horizontal wood fence with a one-foot horizontal wood “trellis-like” addition to the top is proposed outside of the front yard setback on the south property line along parcel 010101020 and 010101021 on 2nd Avenue, replacing existing 6-foot tall vertical wood board and batten fencing. A 6-foot tall and 9-foot 7-inch wide gate is proposed to be constructed along the new fence at the Southeast corner of parcel 010101020. A 4-foot tall double-sided horizontal wood fence and gate are proposed at the same location in the front setback to act as a trash enclosure that can be accessed from the street and from parcel 010101020. CMC 17.10.030.E.1, Table 17.10-B: Setback Exceptions in R-1 District states that trash enclosures are not allowed in the front yard setback. The proposed fencing does not comply with the Carmel Municipal Code or Residential Design Guidelines. Special Condition of Approval #39 requires the applicant to submit revised plans with new fencing for the property that allows for an open feel, filtered light views into the yard, and complies with CMC 17.10.030.E.1 (fences in the front setback shall be below 4 feet, not alterable by the Planning Commission).
A new 4-foot high double-sided horizontal wood fence is being proposed at the west property lines along parcel 010101021 on Torres Street. A new 6-foot high double-sided horizontal wood fence with a one-foot horizontal wood “trellis-like” addition to the top is proposed outside of the side yard setback on the west property line along parcel 010101012 on Torres Street. The proposed fencing does not comply with the Residential Design Guidelines. Special Condition of Approval #39 requires the applicant to submit revised plans with new fencing for the property that allows for an open feel, filtered light views into the yard, and complies with CMC 17.10.030.E.1 (fences in the front setback shall be below 4 feet, not alterable by the Planning Commission).
Site Coverage: CMC Section 17.10.030.C (Site Coverage) limits impermeable site coverage to 22% of the base floor area allowed for the site. On a 4,000-square-foot lot, the allowed base floor area is 1,800 square feet, and the amount of site coverage permitted is 396 square feet. Impermeable materials include asphalt, concrete, mortared brick and stone, decomposed granite, unspaced decking and balconies at any level, garden walls, solariums, bridges, sheds not counted as floor areas, ponds, hot tubs, and swimming pools.
If at least 50 percent of the property's site coverage is made of permeable or semi-permeable materials, an additional amount of site coverage of up to four percent of the site area, 160 square feet, may be allowed for use in a single driveway of up to nine feet in width. Permeable and semi-permeable materials include gravel, spaced decking and exterior stairs, sand-set bricks or pavers, garden walkways of small paving stones, and arbors.
Sites not in compliance with site coverage limits shall not be authorized to increase site coverage (CMC 17.10.030.C.2). Site coverage that was lawfully established but not in compliance with current zoning regulations may be maintained in its current state, however, shall be considered non-conforming. If a non-conforming element is removed, or substantially altered, it shall not be permitted to be rebuilt or re-established in the same location or elsewhere on the site (CMC 17.36.040.E).
For example: if a property has non-conforming site coverage and a patio is removed, new site coverage (such as a new deck, for example) could not be added to the property unless the remaining coverage for the site were brought into compliance with the site coverage limits.
Staff Response: The existing site coverage across all three parcels is 1849 square feet. The applicant proposes to maintain a total of 1849 square feet of site coverage with over half being semi-permeable. Semi-permeable materials include a new permeable paver driveway, existing gravel, and existing spaced decking. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing asphalt driveway with permeable pavers and remove gravel on parcel 010101020 to accommodate the new concrete landings and front staircase. The project, as currently proposed, does not meet the requirements for site coverage. The new concrete landings required under the California Building Code for the new doors adds new site coverage elements to the property which is already nonconforming. Special Condition of Approval #40 requires the applicant to submit revised plans with updated site coverage that is compliant with CMC 17.10.030.C.1-2.
Right-of-Way Character: The applicant is proposing to replace the existing driveway with permeable pavers on the subject site and in the public right-of-way. New 36” retaining walls are proposed on either side of the driveway on the private property and extending into the right-of-way. Concrete stairs and landings are proposed on the West side of the property in the right-of-way. Special Condition of Approval #40 requires the applicant to obtain a permanent encroachment permit prior to the issuance of a building permit.