Zoning District Purpose
The City’s General Plan state the following purpose for the RC Zoning District:
This area is intended to provide for a mix of residential dwellings and a limited range of office and service uses in scale with the character of the community. Less intense commercial uses and visitor accommodations are allowed in this area.
The City’s Municipal Code states the following purpose for the RC Zoning District:
Residential and Limited Commercial (RC). To provide an appropriate location for permanent and transient residential uses, service and office uses, and limited retail uses that do not adversely impact the residential neighborhood. This district is intended to provide a transition and buffer between the more intense activities in the CC and SC districts and the less intense activities in the R-1 and R-4 districts.
As identified in the above referenced citations, the RC Zoning District is primarily intended to be a buffer between the more intensive commercial core and the R-1 District. Retail sales, restaurants and drinking establishments are not allowed in the RC District, and only residential uses and services businesses are permitted. As reflected by the City’s zoning map (see Attachment 3), the blocks on the outer perimeter of the Commercial District are generally zoned RC, with R-1 zoned blocks typically located across the street or in some cases within the same block. In staff’s opinion, the RC zoning designation would be the most appropriate for this site given its proximity to the R-1 District.
General Plan Housing Policies
The proposed project would include 12 new apartment units on Monte Verde Street and two duplexes on Lincoln Street, for a total of 16 new residential units. The Housing Element of the General Plan contains the following pertinent policies that address the addition of new multi-family housing units in the City:
Goal G3-2. Preserve existing residential units and encourage the development of new multi-family housing in the Commercial and R-4 Districts.
Goal G3-3. Provide adequate sites for the development of a wide range of housing types for all citizens.
Goal G3-5. Preserve and increase the supply of housing for lower- and moderate-income households, senior citizens and other special needs groups. Prohibit discrimination in the sale or rental of housing.
In considering this project, the Commission should also consider the City’s Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA), which is a state-mandated process to identify the total number of housing units (by affordability level) that each jurisdiction must accommodate in its Housing Element. The following table identifies the City’s RHNA requirement for the 2015-2023 period:
Allocation
2015-2023
|
Very Low Income
23%
|
Low Income
16%
|
Moderate Income
19%
|
Above Moderate
42%
|
31
|
7
|
5
|
6
|
13
|
The proposal for multi-family housing, and the associated 16 new residential units, is supported by the Housing Element and would help the City achieve its RHNA requirements if the project contains a certain number of affordable housing units. It’s important to note that if the block were to be maintained as an R-1 designation, the applicant could potentially build 5 single-family residences (when subtracting the 2 lots devoted to the new church facility). Rezoning the property to RC would potentially allow an additional 11 units.
General Plan Commercial Expansion Policies
In order to permit the construction of new multi-family housing and church facility, the applicant has requested that parcels owned by the First Church of Christ Scientist on Block 54 be rezoned from R-1 to RC. Even though the request submitted by Mr. Gunner to develop the parking lot is not being consider as part of this agenda, staff would recommend that this property also be rezoned to RC in order to avoid creating an “island” of R-1 property at the northeast corner of Monte Verde Street and 6th Avenue.
With regard to expanding the Commercial District, General Plan Policies P1-1 and P1-2 state the following:
Policy P1-1. Preserve the boundaries of the single-family residential area and allow rezoning within this area only to less intensive uses such as open space or parkland.
Policy P1-2. Contain the commercial district within an area no larger than the 1982 boundary shown in Figure 1.3 [should read Figure 1.2] of the Land Use Element. (Refer to Attachment 1)
The proposed rezone would require that these General Plan policies be amended. Policy P1-1 would have to be amended as well as the associated 1982 boundary map referenced in Policy P1-2. In this particular case, staff could support amending the General Plan to allow the rezone of this property given that it has historically been developed with commercial uses. However, if the Commission supports amending these General Plan policies, then it should consider crafting the amendments in a way that would still curtail commercial expansion throughout the R-1 District. One option is a policy amendment that allows the City to consider R-1 rezoning only in situations such as this, in which the property has historically been used for commercial purposes, but not as a general rule for properties developed with single-family.
Municipal Code Amendments and Community Plan
The Zoning Map would need to be amended to reflect the extent of the rezone from R-1 to RC. The purpose of the RC District is to provide an appropriate location for permanent and transient residential uses, service and office uses, and limited retail uses that do not adversely impact the residential neighborhood.
The proposed design and use of the new facilities would comply with the RC District zoning standards. If the City supports the project and associated rezone, then the applicant would submit separate design review and use permit applications that would be reviewed concurrently with the General Plan and Municipal Code amendments. Staff intends to condition the project with a requirement that the apartment units not be used as short-term rentals.
New Church Facility
The applicant is proposing to construct a new church facility on Lincoln Street, at the current location of the church parking lot. The proposed facility would be significantly smaller than the existing facility. City Municipal Code Section 17.08.040 states that religious facilities are: “Allowed only on existing quasi-public use sites established prior to December 1, 1980, or added as an accessory use to such existing uses.” The church parking lot qualifies as part of the “site” and therefore is permitted at this particular location in the R-1 District.
The General Plan addresses public and quasi-public land uses in the R-1 Distract and states that such uses include nonprofit organizations, churches, and other facilities. The General Plan also includes the following policies pertaining to public and quasi-public uses in the R-1 District:
O1-9 Recognize the contribution of existing public and quasi-public land uses in the R-l district that serve local needs. Allow these existing uses to continue, but limit their expansion and minimize impacts on surrounding R-1 neighborhoods.
P1-55 Limit public and quasi-public uses in the R-l district (such as schools, churches, clubs and foundations) to those sites already established. Prohibit the establishment of new sites and the enlargement of existing sites.
P1-56 Require use permits for all public and quasi-public uses in the R-l district and only allow modifications to these uses through use permit amendments. Limit the physical expansion of any existing structures and the construction of new facilities and uses to those that will not materially increase traffic, noise, parking demand, and or create other adverse impacts on surrounding R-l neighborhoods.
P1-57 Require design modifications to existing public and quasi-public uses in the R-1 district to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Apply design standards to such modifications that are consistent with R-1 design regulations applying to residential property.
The above policies, along with the City’s Municipal Code, indicate that if the zoning were to remain R-1, a new church facility could still be constructed on the parking lot, so long as it is not expanding the existing facility and is compatible with the R-1 design standards. Additionally, relocating the church facility to the Lincoln side of the block would place the church facility farther away from residential uses, which is supported by the above referenced policies. Staff notes that the existing church facility would have to be abandoned and demolished in order to construct the new facility in order to avoid an expansion.
Recommendation/Questions
Staff is seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission on whether the City Council should consider the rezone as requested by the First Church of Christ Scientist and associated General Plan amendments, specifically:
1) Does the Planning Commission support rezoning from R-1 to RC and making the associated General Plan amendments?
2) If so, should General Plan policies P1-1 and P1-2 be amended with a provision that only allows rezoning of R-1 in locations that are currently developed with commercial uses?
3) If the Planning Commission does not support the rezone and General Plan amendments, does it agree with staff’s analysis that a new church facility could be constructed on the parking lot if the existing facility is abandoned?
Staff will present the Planning Commission’s recommendations to the City Council and seek direction on whether to initiate the amendments.
Next Steps
Should the Planning Commission and City Council choose to move forward and study the request, the next steps in the process would be:
1) Receive a formal application for a General Plan Amendment, Rezone, Design Review and Use Permit;
2) Solicit a consultant to prepare an Initial Study in accordance with CEQA;
3) Enter into a consulting services agreement;
4) Prepare the appropriate environmental document;
5) Present the project to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation to the City Council;
6) Present the project to the City Council for final adoption.
7) Submit the amendments to the Coastal Commission for certification.